TSTP Solution File: NUM796^1 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10
% Problem  : NUM796^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  7 10:45:46 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 3.70s 1.90s
% Output   : Refutation 3.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  13 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  218 (  15   ~;  13   |;   0   &; 178   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0   ^  50   !;   0   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(rat_type,type,
    rat: $tType ).

thf(x0_type,type,
    x0: rat ).

thf(y0_type,type,
    y0: rat ).

thf(z0_type,type,
    z0: rat ).

thf(u0_type,type,
    u0: rat ).

thf(less_type,type,
    less: rat > rat > $o ).

thf(lessis_type,type,
    lessis: rat > rat > $o ).

thf(pl_type,type,
    pl: rat > rat > rat ).

thf(more_type,type,
    more: rat > rat > $o ).

thf(moreis_type,type,
    moreis: rat > rat > $o ).

thf(4,axiom,
    lessis @ z0 @ u0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k) ).

thf(11,plain,
    lessis @ z0 @ u0,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat] :
      ( ( lessis @ A @ B )
     => ( moreis @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz85) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat] :
      ( ( lessis @ A @ B )
     => ( moreis @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ~ ( lessis @ A @ B )
      | ( moreis @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[19]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ( moreis @ B @ A )
      | ( ( lessis @ z0 @ u0 )
       != ( lessis @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[11,20]) ).

thf(69,plain,
    moreis @ u0 @ z0,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[68:[bind(A,$thf( z0 )),bind(B,$thf( u0 ))]]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    less @ x0 @ y0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).

thf(10,plain,
    less @ x0 @ y0,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat] :
      ( ( less @ A @ B )
     => ( more @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz83) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat] :
      ( ( less @ A @ B )
     => ( more @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( more @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ( more @ B @ A )
      | ( ( less @ x0 @ y0 )
       != ( less @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[10,18]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    more @ y0 @ x0,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[44:[bind(A,$thf( x0 )),bind(B,$thf( y0 ))]]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat,C: rat,D: rat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( ( moreis @ C @ D )
       => ( more @ ( pl @ A @ C ) @ ( pl @ B @ D ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz99b) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat,C: rat,D: rat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( ( moreis @ C @ D )
       => ( more @ ( pl @ A @ C ) @ ( pl @ B @ D ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ! [C: rat,D: rat] :
          ( ( moreis @ C @ D )
         => ( more @ ( pl @ A @ C ) @ ( pl @ B @ D ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [D: rat,C: rat,B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ~ ( more @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( moreis @ C @ D )
      | ( more @ ( pl @ A @ C ) @ ( pl @ B @ D ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[15]) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [D: rat,C: rat,B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ~ ( moreis @ C @ D )
      | ( more @ ( pl @ A @ C ) @ ( pl @ B @ D ) )
      | ( ( more @ y0 @ x0 )
       != ( more @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[45,16]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ~ ( moreis @ A @ B )
      | ( more @ ( pl @ y0 @ A ) @ ( pl @ x0 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[58:[bind(A,$thf( y0 )),bind(B,$thf( x0 ))]]) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ~ ( moreis @ A @ B )
      | ( more @ ( pl @ y0 @ A ) @ ( pl @ x0 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ( more @ ( pl @ y0 @ A ) @ ( pl @ x0 @ B ) )
      | ( ( moreis @ u0 @ z0 )
       != ( moreis @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[69,61]) ).

thf(81,plain,
    more @ ( pl @ y0 @ u0 ) @ ( pl @ x0 @ z0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[80:[bind(A,$thf( u0 )),bind(B,$thf( z0 ))]]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( less @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz82) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: rat,B: rat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( less @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ~ ( more @ A @ B )
      | ( less @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[12]) ).

thf(86,plain,
    ! [B: rat,A: rat] :
      ( ( less @ B @ A )
      | ( ( more @ ( pl @ y0 @ u0 ) @ ( pl @ x0 @ z0 ) )
       != ( more @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[81,13]) ).

thf(87,plain,
    less @ ( pl @ x0 @ z0 ) @ ( pl @ y0 @ u0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[86:[bind(A,$thf( pl @ y0 @ u0 )),bind(B,$thf( pl @ x0 @ z0 ))]]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    less @ ( pl @ x0 @ z0 ) @ ( pl @ y0 @ u0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz99d) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( less @ ( pl @ x0 @ z0 ) @ ( pl @ y0 @ u0 ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ( less @ ( pl @ x0 @ z0 ) @ ( pl @ y0 @ u0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(92,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[87,9]) ).

thf(93,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[92]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM796^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Mon May  6 19:40:24 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.94/0.85  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (123ms). 
% 1.24/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.64/1.19  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.64/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.76/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 6 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.80/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 6 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.80/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.80/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.80/1.28  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.70/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.70/1.89  % Time passed: 1368ms (effective reasoning time: 904ms)
% 3.70/1.89  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.70/1.90  % Axioms used in derivation (6): l, satz82, satz83, satz99b, k, satz85
% 3.70/1.90  % No. of inferences in proof: 33
% 3.70/1.90  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1368 ms resp. 904 ms w/o parsing
% 3.70/1.93  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.70/1.93  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------